Why I'm Not EmergENT

"Young people will give their lives for an exclamation point, but they will not give their lives for a question mark, not for very long, anyway." -Kevin DeYoung

In a break from the usual posts about theology and politics, I thought it would be beneficial to explain why I do not consider myself Emergent, and give some thoughts on a book I just finished reading, Why We're Not Emergent (by two Guys who should be).
First to review the book, then to explain myself.

Over all, I enjoyed reading this book. It was insightful, incredibly gracious and focused. I was impressed by the authors ability to be "authentic" and dissect the Emergent movement. Co-written by a Pastor and a professional writer, this book feels like a cross between Blue Like Jazz and Becoming Conversant with the Emergent Church. Kevin DeYoung's chapters read like a good theological interpretation of the movement, and Ted Kluck's chapters read like the narrative of someone figuring out the movement.
They address some of the big issues of the Emergent movement, including Foundationalism, the Journey motif, and even the downplay of Doctrine for experience. They systematically examine the core assumptions of Emergents and point out some of the serious flaws within their thinking. I do not want to take the time to examine everything they wrote, but I would definitely recommend this book to anyone interested in the movement.

This book has given me much food for thought, as I seek to relate my faith to the world around me. I have often considered myself to be emerging, as I have identified with the sentiments of authors like Don Miller, Mark Driscoll, and Anthony Bradley. I have even enjoyed and appreciated the writings of Brian MacLaren, Dan Kimball and Rob Bell, though I have been concerned by some of the trends coming from these authors.
So after much consideration, I thought it might be beneficial to define where I fall theologically for you, the reader.
I AM:
1. not emergent.
2. not a fundamentalist.
3. not a Republican (yes this is a theological issue)
4. emerging. (I'll explain my terms)
5. generally Calvinistic/reformed.
6. politically conscious as an Independent.

1. While i do find myself outside many traditional concepts of church, I am not pluralistic or reductionistic. I believe that the Bible is the inspired, inerrant Word of God, and that it is authoritative for everyday life. I hold to the universal depravity of the human race, original sin and both the complete sovereignty of God and Human Responsibility.
2. While I agree with the majority of the fundamentals of the Christian faith, I reject the legalistic, tradition-centered practice of fundamentalism. I intentionally align my theological thought with those men who are willing to practice moderation as a spiritual gift. This means that I defend the ability of all Christians to decide for themselves on issues not explicit in scripture. It is my personal conviction that drinking alcohol or smoking tobacco are legitimate activities for a believer, in moderation, provided that they do not violate the biblical standards of physical health and responsibility. Basically, I would argue that its okay to drink a pint or smoke a cigar, provided that you are not getting drunk or addicted.
3. While it may seem ironic that I included my "political" position within my "theological" position, it is intentional and I believe, biblically necessary to do so. In recent years, the Conservative evangelical movement has become associated with republican politics. Thanks to men like Falwell and Robertson, most conservatives are portrayed as big-business, small government pro-life Republicans. While I do not have a problem with Christians who choose to support the Republican Party, I have a big problem with the alledged "Religious Right" / "Moral Majority". The Jesus I read about in the Gospels is not a politician, he specifically says that his Kingodm, and thus our kingdom is not of this earth. I believe it is vitally important (see previous post) to fight for the rights of unborn humans, I even believe that the government should be regulated, but I am not willing to equate my "theology" with the Republican Party. So, basically, I have no problem with people being Republicans, i simply have a problem with the Republican party being the "Christian party".
4. I consider myself part of the emerging movement of God in America. I intentionally differentiate between the movement of God in our country, and those who associate with Emergent Village. The emerging movement encompasses, as far as I can tell, many different streams of theological and practical thought. Within the movement are the New Reformed guys, the Emergent Village Guys, the house church movement and several other lesser streams. Through my associations with like-minded individuals, I consider myself part of the New Reformed stream, and follow thinkers like D.A. Carson, Tim Keller, Mark Driscoll and Anthony Bradley. I believe that the "traditional church" must see major reforms if it is to survive. The Gospel transforms lives, yet it seems that the "traditional" church has left the job of bringing the Gospel to the culture by the way side.
That said, the traditional church's theology, for the most part, is grounded in biblical teaching, whereas a number of the more emerging thinkers are willing to compromise doctrinal convictions as they study their theology.
5. After much study and prayer, I have settled my basic soteriological study and come to genrally agree with the Particular election view of men like Carson, Piper and Driscoll. I am still working through all the implications of that theology, and am unwilling to define the limtis of the atonement. I will be posting soon on my recent reading and conclusions on scripture.
6. As I stated previously, I do not vote along party lines. I will not take time here to discuss each of my political beliefs, nor anger those who disagree with me. I am willing to go on record that I do believe that the Sanctity of Human life should be a primary concern of the voter.

Emerging streams of thought are very important to Christianity's future. As I participate in this conversation, I hope to defend the orthodox doctrines of our faith and present the gospel in new and unique ways to this emerging generation.
More thoughts to come...

The Church and Politics: A Rant

I love America as a nation. I believe that we should respect and honor our flag and the other symbols of our nation. That said, I have a problem with the current way in which most Christians relate to politics. Where is the Love?
I do not mean to be trite or passe in my examination of Christian politics, I simply want to make a few observations.
1. Where in scripture does it teach us to impose our moral standards on our society? Are we supposed to make our society, even our country, into a moralistic, legalistic, democracy?
I would humbly propose that we are not commanded to moralize our country, but we are in fact called to lovingly evangelize our country. What America needs right now are not more hypocritical, bible-toting politicians, but more men and women in politics whose lives have been changed by the cross of Jesus Christ. We do not need another "Moral Majority", we do not even need a "Christian Coalition". What we need are men and women of biblical conviction to lovingly seek to make this country better.

2. (I'm gonna make some of you angry with me.)
How is it loving, in our cultural context to fight for the legal rights of the unborn?
Now, before you all try to excommunicate me, let me explain what I'm saying.
I believe its a gross injustice that 45,000 human beings are murdered every year. I believe that abortion is one of the single most heinous crimes going on in America today. However, that said, I believe that the way in which we our attempting to end the injustice is wrong. While I do believe that the Roe v. Wade decision was wrong and should be overturned, I think we are fighting this battle from the wrong direction. Rather than pouring billions into lobbyists and ad campaigns, what if we poured billions into crisis pregnancy centers and women's shelters? What if we fought for life one women at a time, instead of one law at a time? The problem I see, is that if we merely try to overturn a federal ruling, how are we loving individual people? Most women don't understand why we are fighting against their "right" to choose abortion. What if instead of condemning women for having abortions, we showed them beating hearts, and the effects of abortions on others. How would we be perceived then, if we simply loved them? This whole train of the thought leads me to my final thought.

3. What would happen if Christians were known by what we love and not by what we hate?
What would happen if we were known for loving women or for loving homosexuals? What if we sought to lovingly change what one person at a time? Instead of spending billions to legislate against abortion or gay marriage, what if we poured that money into one-on-one relational ministry, what if we supported people and programs to help pregnant women and gays find answers? I'm not saying we should condone abortion or homosexual acts, but I find it troubling that so many who do not condone those actions portray themselves as if they hate those involved in these sins.
So thats me political rant for the day. Stay tuned.

Good Friday and Accomplished Redemption

Almost two thousand years ago, a homeless Palestinian Jew, a carpenter-turned-prophet was crucified by the Roman government for being a traitor.
This man made the audacious claim that he was God himself, come to "save" the world.
The Jews were looking for a Messiah, someone to free them from the harsh rule of Rome.
But this Jesus did not preach rebellion, or even resistance.
This Jesus was not concerned with political freedom. His concern was eternal.
Some remember this Jew as a great teacher, a man who spoke of a greater morality.
This was the Jesus who taught us to "love others as you love yourself". But he could not be God, that is just preposterous...
Some remember this Jesus as a great prophet, a speaker of truth. This was the man who raised the dead and healed the sick. But he could not be God, that would be insane.
I remember that Jew as a savior. I remember this Jesus because he told me, "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life; no one comes to the Father, except through me." He must have been God, for otherwise he would be a horrible moral example, a liar who should be ignored. He must have been God, or he wasn't a good prophet, for he claimed he was God and said he would rise in three days.
This Jesus willingly laid down his life, in the greatest act of Love the world has ever seen.
He chose to die an excruciating death, at the hands of evil men, counted as a criminal, all for the sake of men and women who hated him.
This is love, that an innocent man would exchange his life for the life of the vilest of criminals, a man like me.
Let us not forget on this Good Friday that God himself exchanged his glorious place on high, for a crucified body on a Roman Cross, that we who have fled from God might be redeemed.

Soli Deo Gloria

Community Questions

[This is a tangential post related to the larger purpose of the blog]

What does it mean to live in community with other believers?
This is a question that has been haunting me for the last several months.
When we examine the early church, we see a very simple picture.
"And they devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers.
And awe came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were being done through the apostles.
And all who believed were together and had all things in common. And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need.
And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts,
praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved."
Acts 2:42-47

So in response to God's word, I have a few thoughtful questions for any who should read this post. I pray that these will challenge you...

1. Who do you, as a believer, share your life with?
2. Who are you, as a believer, accountable with?
3. What do you do with your free time?
4. Are you actively participating in a church community?
5. If you are not involved in a church community, why not?
6. How are you involved with your church community?
7. Do you intentionally reflect the love of God to those around you?
8. Who challenges you to be more like Christ?

These are questions that I have been working through as I try to better understand what it means to live in a redemptive community.

A New vision fo the Blog

Having decided to close down The Revolution blog, I have been rethinking what this blog needs to be about.
As I expressed in my post from yesterday, I am really frustrated with so much of what is going on in Evangelicalism today. I'm going to be spending the next few months examining Evangelicalism in light of God's Redemptive Mission.
To give you a teaser, here is the opening of my first post on the Topic.

"This series will seek to successfully diagnose the problems with current attempts at living Christianity in America, and to demonstrate how the story of Redemption should influence the way we live out our faith in this Culture..."

Be checking back as I seek to develop a holistic, biblical theology of Redemption.